Write one sentence that a skeptic would accept, like “response times spike Mondays.” Anchor the map there, not in assumed causes. Each added arrow must earn its place with observable data, experiments, or experience, otherwise the loop becomes storytelling rather than learning.
Label virtuous or vicious cycles with R, and goal-seeking behaviors with B. Ask which loop currently dominates, and what would let a healthier loop take the lead. Naming loops helps teams stop arguing positions and start comparing structures and leverage points.
Each morning, pick one recurring annoyance and sketch the simplest loop connecting symptom, quick fix, and side effect. Label delays, then write one structural action you could test within a week. Small, steady experiments teach faster than rare, heroic transformations.
Capture what you expected would happen, what actually happened, and which loop dominated. Speculate about missing variables or delayed effects. This habit builds a library of lived patterns that accelerates recognition the next time a fix starts looking suspiciously attractive.